Skip to main content
Log in

Mycorrhizal colonization across hydrologic gradients in restored and reference freshwater wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizae, which are plant root-fungal symbioses, are common associates of vascular plants. Such relationships, however, are thought to be rare in wetland plant roots, although several recent studies suggest that arbuscular mycorrhizae may be important in wetland ecosystems. Our objectives were to determine (1) the level of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of plant roots in three freshwater marshes and (2) the effect of restoration status, hydrologic zone, and plant species identity on mycorrhizal colonization. We quantified the percentage of plant roots colonized by mycorrhizal fungi in one reference and two restored freshwater marshes in northern Indiana, USA during summer 1999. Roots were collected from soil cores taken around dominant plant species present in each of three hydrologie zones and then stained for microscopic examination of mycorrhizal colonization. Mycorrhizae were present in each wetland, in all hydrologie zones and in all sampled plants, includingCarex andScirpus species previously thought to be non-mycorrhizal. Both restored and reference wetlands had moderate levels of mycorrhizal colonization, but no clear trends in colonization were seen with hydrologie zone, which has been hypothesized to regulate the formation of mycorrhizae in wetlands. Mycorrhizal colonization levels in the roots of individual species ranged from 3 to 90% and were particularly large in members of the Poaceae (grass) family. Our results suggest that arbuscular mycorrhizae may be widely distributed across plant species and hydrologic zones in both restored and reference freshwater marshes. Thus, future research should examine the functional role of mycorrhizal fungi in freshwater wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abbott, L. K. and A. D. Robson. 1991. Factors influencing the occurrence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 35:121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. F. 1991. The Ecology of Mycorrhizae Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. F. 1996. The Ecology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: a look back into the 20th century and a peek into the 21st. Mycological Research 100:769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, E. B. and M. F. Allen. 1990. The mediation of competition by mycorrhizae in successional and patchy environments. p. 367–389.In J. B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds.) Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, T., D. M. Sylvia, and R. F. Doren. 1995. Activity and species composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi following soil removal. Ecological Applications 5:776–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Nielsen, D. and T. Vindaek Madsen. 2001. Occurrence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in aquatic macrophytes from lakes and streams. Aquatic Botany 71:141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. M. and C. Bledsoe. 1996. Spatial and temporal dynamics of mycorrhizas inJaumea carnosa, a tidal saltmarsh halophyte. Journal of Ecology 84:703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett, M.. 1991. Mycorrhizas in Natural Ecosystems. p. 171–277.In M. Begon, A. H. Fitter, and A. Macfadyen (eds.) Advances in Ecological Research, Volume 21. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J. C. and M. W. Lefor. 1990. Comparison of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plants from disturbed and adjacent undisturbed regions of coastal salt marsh in Clinton, Connecticut, USA. Environmental Management 14:131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J. C. and M. W. Lefor. 1998. The mycorrhizal status of selected plant species from Connecticut wetlands and transition zones. Restoration Ecology 6:214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, W. K., B. L. Bedford, and C. T. Chapin. 2001. Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a phosphorus-poor wetland and mycorrhizal response to phosphorus fertilization. American Journal of Botany 88:1824–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. and D. J. Read. 1994. The contributions of mycorrhizal fungus to the determination of plant community structure. Plant and Soil 159:11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannetti, M. and B. Mosse. 1980. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytologist 84:489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. L. 1991. Introduction: the state of the art. p. 1–23.In J. R. Norris, D. J. Read, and A. K. Varma (eds.) Methods in Microbiology, Volume 23 Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, D. and G. Wilson. 1999. Hycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80:1187–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick, B. A. D., K. Gershefske, and G. W. T. Wilson. 1988. Mycorrhizal dependence and growth of warm-season and cool-season tallgrass prairie plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 66:1376–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick, B. A. D., D. C. Hartnett, G. W. T. Wilson, and D. J. Gibson. 1994. Effects of mycorrhizae, phosphorous availability, and plant density on yield relationships among competing tallgrass prairie grasses. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. M. and P. A. Mason. 1984. Mycorrhiza. Edward Arnold Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, C. H. and S. D. Bridgham. 2002. Colonization during early succession of restored freshwater marshes. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. G. 1974. The occurrence of mycorrhizas in halophytes, hydrophytes and xerophytes, and on endogone spores in adjacent soils. Journal of General Microbiology 81:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormanik, P. P. and A. C. McGraw. 1982. Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. p. 37–45.In N. C. Schenck (ed.) Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koske, R. E. and J. N. Gemma. 1989. A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycological Research 92:486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. B. and C. T. Figueiredo. 1993. Total nitrogen. p. 201–212.In M.R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle, T. P., M. H. Miller, D. G. Evans, G. L. Fairehild, and J. A. Swan. 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 115:495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. M., C. I. Smith, J. D. Jastrow and J. D. Bever. 1999. Mycorrhizal status of the genus Carex (Cyperaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:547–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. P.. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of semiaquatic grasses along a wide hydrologic gradient. New Phytologist 145:145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. P. and R. R. Sharitz. 2000. Manipulation of flooding and arbuscular mycorrhiza formation influences growth and nutrition of two semiaquatic grass species. Functional Ecology 14:739–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Halloran, I. P. 1993. Total and organic phosphorus. p. 213–230.In M. R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozinga, W. A., J. van Andel, and M. P. McDonnell-Alexander. 1997. Nutritional soil heterogeneity and mycorrhiza as determinants of plant species diversity. Acta Botanical Nerrlandica 46: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, C. L.. 1975. Rushes and sedges are non-mycotrophic. Plant and Soil 42:481–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. J., H. K. Koucheki, and J. Hodgson. 1976. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. New Phytologist 77:641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, F. B., D. Wagner, T. Moorman, and J. Kiel. 1979. The role of endomycorrhizae in revegetation practices in the semi-arid west. I. A comparison of incidence of mycorrhizae in severely disturbed vs. natural environments. American Journal of Botany 66:6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickerl, D. H., F. O. Sancho and S. Ananth. 1994. Vesicular-arbuscular endomycorrhizal colonization of wetland plants. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:913–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., M. Madan, and P. Vasudevan. 1997. Biology and applications of mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiologia Sem 13:427–436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrick, B. H. and C. Wang. 1993. Particle size distribution. p. 499–512.In M. R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenlund, D. L. and I. D. Charvat. 1994. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae in floating wetland mat communities dominated byTypha. Mycorrhiza 4:131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. J. and R. L. Peterson. 1996. The effect of a water gradient on the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal status ofLythrum salicaria L. (purple loosestrife). Mycorrhiza 6:99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F., J. A. White, and I. Charvat. 2001. The effect of phosphorus availability on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization ofTypha angustifolia. Mycologia 93:1042–1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, H. and J. O. Moir. 1993. Total and organic carbon. p. 187–200.In M.R. Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. D. and C. F. Friese. 1998. Plant-mycorrhizal community dynamies associated with a moisture gradient within a rehabilitated prairie fen. Restoration Ecology 6:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. D., J. P. Amon, R. M. Schneble, and C. F. Friese. 2000. Mycorrhizal fungi associated with plants in ground-water fed wetlands. Wetlands 20:200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thormann, M. N., R. S. Currah, and S. E. Bayley. 1999. The mycorrhizal status of the dominant vegetation along a peatland gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 19:438–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, M. G. A., M. U. Klironomos, P. Moutoglis, R. Streitwolf-Engel, T. Boller, A. Wiemken, and I. R. Sanders. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, E. W 1972. Michigan Flora. Part I. Cranbrook Institute of Science and University of Michigan Herbarium, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA. Bulletin 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, P. R. and A. G. van der Valk. 1996. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in prairie pothole wetland vegetation in Iowa and North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany 74:883–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. A. and I. Charvat. 1999. The mycorrhizal status of an emergent aquatic,Lythrum salicaria L., at different levels of phosphorus availability. Mycorrhiza 9:191–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, C. and J. C. Stevenson, 1994. The presence and possible ecological significance of mycorrhizae of the submersed macrophyte,Vallisneria americana. Estuaries 17:206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, C.R., Kellogg, C.H., Bridgham, S.D. et al. Mycorrhizal colonization across hydrologic gradients in restored and reference freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 23, 961–968 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0961:MCAHGI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0961:MCAHGI]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation